Performance Evaluation of Best Path Selection Protocol in Multi-hop Relaying Networks under Joint Impact of Co-channel Interference and Hardware Impairments
Abstract
This paper evaluates outage probability (OP) of a path-selection protocol in multi-path multi-hop decode-and-forward (DF) relaying networks. In the considered protocol, relying on the end-to-end signal to interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR), the best path between the source and the destination is selected to enhance the outage performance under joint impact of co-channel interference and hardware imperfection. We derive exact and asymptotic closed-form expressions of the end-to-end OP for the considered protocol over Rayleigh fading channels. The simulation results are then presented to validate the theoretical results.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
[1] M. O. Hasna and M.-S. Alouini, “End-to-end performance of transmission system with relays over Rayleigh-fading channels,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1126–1131, Jun. 2003.
[2] H.V. Khuong and V. N. Q. Bao, “On the Performance of Underlay Relay Cognitive Networks,” REV Journal on Electronics and Communications, vol. 3, no. 1-2, pp. 12–20, Jan.-Jun. 2012.
[3] G. Farhadi, N. C. Beaulieu, “On the outage and error probability of amplify-and-forward multi-hop diversity transmission systems,” in Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 3748–3754, 2008.
[4] G. Farhadi, N. Beaulieu, “Fixed relaying versus selective relaying in multi-hop diversity transmission systems,” IEEE Trans. on Wire. Commun., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 956–965, Mar. 2010.
[5] M. R. Bhatnagar, “Performance analysis of a path selection scheme in multi-hop decode-and-forward protocol,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1980–1983, Dec. 2012.
[6] M. R. Bhatnagar, R. K. Mallik, and O. Tirkkonen, “Performance evaluation of best-path selection in a multihop
decode-and-forward cooperative system,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 2722–2728, Apr. 2016.
[7] T. D. Hieu, T. T. Duy, B.-S. Kim, “Performance Enhancement for Multi-hop Harvest-to-Transmit WSNs With Path-Selection Methods in Presence of Eavesdroppers and Hardware Noises,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 5173–5186, Jun. 2018.
[8] H. A. Suraweera, H. K. Garg, and A. Nallanathan, “Performance analysis of two hop amplify-and-forward systems with interference at the relay,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 692–694, Aug. 2010.
[9] E. Soleimani-Nasab, M. Matthaiou, M. Ardebilipour, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Two-way af relaying in the presence of cochannel interference,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 3156–3169, Aug. 2013.
[10] J. Guo, C. Pei, and H. Yang, “Performance analysis of TAS/MRC in MIMO relay systems with outdated CSI and
co-channel interference,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 4848–4856, Sept. 2014.
[11] T. T. Duy, Trung Q. Duong, D. B. da Costa, V. N. Q. Bao, M. Elkashlan, “Proactive Relay Selection with Joint Impact of Hardware Impairment and Co-channel Interference,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1594–1606, May 2015.
[12] T. Duy, Cao N. Trang, V. N. Q. Bao and T. Hanh, “Joint Impact of Hardware Impairment and Co-channel Interference on Multi-hop Relaying,” in Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC 2015) , Ho Chi Minh city, Viet Nam, pp. 88–92, Oct. 2015.
[13] J. N. Laneman, D. Tse, and G.Wornell, “Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior,”IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 3062–3080, Dec. 2004.
[14] M. Matthaiou, A. Papadogiannis, E. Bjornson, and M. Debbah, “Two-way relaying under the presence of relay
transceiver hardware impairments,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1136–1139, June 2013.
[15] J. Li, M. Matthaiou, and T. Svensson, “I/Q imbalance in AF dual-hop relaying: Performance analysis in nakagami-m fading,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 836–847, Mar. 2014.
[16] A. Bletsas, A. Khisti, D. P. Reed, and A. Lippman, “Simple cooperative diversity method based on network path selection,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 659–672, Mar. 2006.
[2] H.V. Khuong and V. N. Q. Bao, “On the Performance of Underlay Relay Cognitive Networks,” REV Journal on Electronics and Communications, vol. 3, no. 1-2, pp. 12–20, Jan.-Jun. 2012.
[3] G. Farhadi, N. C. Beaulieu, “On the outage and error probability of amplify-and-forward multi-hop diversity transmission systems,” in Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 3748–3754, 2008.
[4] G. Farhadi, N. Beaulieu, “Fixed relaying versus selective relaying in multi-hop diversity transmission systems,” IEEE Trans. on Wire. Commun., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 956–965, Mar. 2010.
[5] M. R. Bhatnagar, “Performance analysis of a path selection scheme in multi-hop decode-and-forward protocol,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1980–1983, Dec. 2012.
[6] M. R. Bhatnagar, R. K. Mallik, and O. Tirkkonen, “Performance evaluation of best-path selection in a multihop
decode-and-forward cooperative system,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 2722–2728, Apr. 2016.
[7] T. D. Hieu, T. T. Duy, B.-S. Kim, “Performance Enhancement for Multi-hop Harvest-to-Transmit WSNs With Path-Selection Methods in Presence of Eavesdroppers and Hardware Noises,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 5173–5186, Jun. 2018.
[8] H. A. Suraweera, H. K. Garg, and A. Nallanathan, “Performance analysis of two hop amplify-and-forward systems with interference at the relay,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 692–694, Aug. 2010.
[9] E. Soleimani-Nasab, M. Matthaiou, M. Ardebilipour, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Two-way af relaying in the presence of cochannel interference,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 3156–3169, Aug. 2013.
[10] J. Guo, C. Pei, and H. Yang, “Performance analysis of TAS/MRC in MIMO relay systems with outdated CSI and
co-channel interference,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 4848–4856, Sept. 2014.
[11] T. T. Duy, Trung Q. Duong, D. B. da Costa, V. N. Q. Bao, M. Elkashlan, “Proactive Relay Selection with Joint Impact of Hardware Impairment and Co-channel Interference,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1594–1606, May 2015.
[12] T. Duy, Cao N. Trang, V. N. Q. Bao and T. Hanh, “Joint Impact of Hardware Impairment and Co-channel Interference on Multi-hop Relaying,” in Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC 2015) , Ho Chi Minh city, Viet Nam, pp. 88–92, Oct. 2015.
[13] J. N. Laneman, D. Tse, and G.Wornell, “Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior,”IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 3062–3080, Dec. 2004.
[14] M. Matthaiou, A. Papadogiannis, E. Bjornson, and M. Debbah, “Two-way relaying under the presence of relay
transceiver hardware impairments,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1136–1139, June 2013.
[15] J. Li, M. Matthaiou, and T. Svensson, “I/Q imbalance in AF dual-hop relaying: Performance analysis in nakagami-m fading,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 836–847, Mar. 2014.
[16] A. Bletsas, A. Khisti, D. P. Reed, and A. Lippman, “Simple cooperative diversity method based on network path selection,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 659–672, Mar. 2006.
Published
2018-09-30
How to Cite
PHAM THI DAN, Ngoc et al.
Performance Evaluation of Best Path Selection Protocol in Multi-hop Relaying Networks under Joint Impact of Co-channel Interference and Hardware Impairments.
Journal of Science and Technology: Issue on Information and Communications Technology, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 33-38, sep. 2018.
ISSN 1859-1531.
Available at: <http://ict.jst.udn.vn/index.php/jst/article/view/66>. Date accessed: 22 nov. 2024.
doi: https://doi.org/10.31130/jst.2018.66.
Section
Articles
