Quality-of-Service Differentiation for Smart Grid Neighbor Area Networks
Abstract
Neighbor Area Networks (NAN) play a crucial role in the Smart Grid Communications Network (SGCN) and provide connectivity for a vast number of smart meters (SMs) while meeting the varying Quality-of-Service (QoS) requirements of different types of Smart Grid (SG) applications. To that effect, this paper explores the incorporation of QoS differentiation at the network layer in order to shape and control traffic of multiple classes in an end-to-end manner for the SG NAN using the Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL). In particular, this paper proposes QoS enabling extensions, RPL-M and RPL-M+, within the RPL framework by associating multiple network graph instances to different SG application requirements. For illustration, the paper considers two deployment scenarios: large-scale dense urban area and microgrid-based remote rural region. Simulation-centric performance evaluation, in terms of latency and throughput, is performed for periodic and critical traffic classes, for two distinct grid conditions, with increasing data traffic load. The rural region is chosen to highlight achievable performance for microgrids and the transferability of results to different grid architectures.
Downloads
References
[1] C. Feisst, D. Schlesinger, and W. Frye, “Smart grid, the role of electricity infrastructure in reducing greenhouse gas emissions,”Cisco internet business solution group, white paper, Oct. 2008.
[2] “What caused the power blackout to spread so widely and so fast?” Genscape, Aug. 2003.
[3] “Major power outage hits New York, other large cities,” CNN, Aug. 2003.
[4] “The great 2003 North America blackout,” CBC, Aug. 2003.
[5] H. L. Willis and W. G. Scott, “Distributed power generation - planning and evaluation,” Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000.
[6] R. G. Pratt et al., “The smart grid: An estimation of the energy and CO2 benefits,” U.S. Department of Energy, Tech. Rep., Jan. 2010.
[7] Draft Guide for Smart Grid Interoperability of Energy Technology and Information Technology Operation With the Electric Power System (EPS), and End-Use Applications and Loads, IEEE P2030 Std., 2011.
[8] G. Rajalingham, Q.-D. Ho, and T. Le-Ngoc, “Evaluation of an efficient smart grid communication system at the neighbor area level,” in the 11th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC’2014), Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S., Jan. 2014.
[9] Q.-D. Ho, Y. Gao, G. Rajalingham, and T. Le-Ngoc, Wireless Communications Networks for the Smart Grid. Springer International Publishing, 2014.
[10] Q.-D. Ho, Y. Gao, and T. Le-Ngoc, “Challenges and research opportunities in wireless communications networks for smart grid,” IEEE Wireless Communications, pp. 89–95, Jun. 2013.
[11] Q.-D. Ho and T. Le-Ngoc, “Smart grid communications networks: Wireless technologies, protocols, issues and standards,”in Handbook on Green Information and Communication Systems, S. O. Mohammad, A. Alagan, and W. Isaac, Eds. Elsevier, 2012.
[12] N. Saputro, K. Akkaya, and S. Uludag, “A survey of routing protocols for smart grid communications,” Computer Networks, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 2742 – 2771, 2012.
[13] Q.-D. Ho, Y. Gao, G. Rajalingham, and T. Le-Ngoc, “Performance and applicability of candidate routing protocols for smart grid’s wireless mesh neighbor-area networks,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’2014), Sydney, Australia, Jun. 2014.
[14] ——, “Robustness of the routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks (RPL) in smart grid’s neighbor-area networks,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’2014), London, UK, Jun. 2015.
[15] Y. Gao, “Performance and applicability of candidate routing protocols for smart grid’s wireless mesh neighbor-area networks,” Master’s thesis, McGill University, 2014.
[16] K. Hopkinson et al., “Quality-of-service considerations in utility communication networks,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1465–1474, Jul. 2009.
[17] S. K. Tan et al., “M2M communications in the smart grid: Applications, standards, enabling technologies, and research challenges,” International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting, pp. 1–8, 2011.
[18] P. Thai, “Packet-level QoS over RPL: Routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks,” Master’s thesis, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 2011.
[19] I. Al-Anbagi, “Quality of service for wireless sensor networks in smart grid applications,” Master’s thesis, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, 2013.
[20] I. Al-Anbagi, M. Erol-Kantarci, and H. T. Mouftah, “Delay critical smart grid applications and adaptive QoS provisioning,” IEEE Access, vol. 3, pp. 1367–1378, 2015.
[21] J. S. Vardakas, N. Zorba, C. Skianis, and C. V. Verikoukis, “Performance analysis of M2M communication networks for QoS-differentiated smart grid applications,” in 2015 IEEE Globecom Workshops, Dec 2015, pp. 1–6.
[22] G. Shah, V. Gungor, and O. Akan, “A cross-layer QoSaware communication framework in cognitive radio sensor networks for smart grid applications,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1477–1485, Aug 2013.
[23] N. T. Long, M.-P. Uwase, J. Tiberghien, and K. Steenhaut, “QoS-aware cross-layer mechanism for multiple instances RPL,” in 2013 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC’13), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, October 2013.
[24] G. Rajalingham, Y. Gao, Q.-D. Ho, and T. Le-Ngoc, “Quality of service differentiation for smart grid neighbor area networks through multiple rpl instances,” in Proceedings of the 10th ACM Symposium on QoS and Security for Wireless and Mobile Networks, ser. Q2SWinet ’14. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 17–24.
[25] J. Ko et al., “Evaluating the performance of RPL and 6LoWPAN in TinyOS,” in Proc. theWorkshop on Extending the Internet to Low power and Lossy Networks (IP+SN), Chicago, IL, USA, 2011.
[26] M. Nucolone, “Stability analysis of the delays of the routing protocol over low power and lossy networks,” Master’s thesis, KTH Electrical Engineering, 2010.
[27] D. Wang et al., “RPL based routing for advanced metering infrastructure in smart grid,” Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Tech. Rep. TR2010-053, Jul. 2010.
[28] P. Kulkarni et al., “A self-organising mesh networking solution based on enhanced RPL for smart metering communications,” in Proc. IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), Jun. 2011, pp. 1–6.
[29] J. Tripathi, J. C. de Oliveira, and J. P. Vasseur, “Applicability study of RPL with local repair in smart grid substation networks,” in Proc. the First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), Oct. 2010, pp. 262–267.
[30] NIST Priority Action Plan 2 - Guidelines for Assessing Wireless Standards for Smart Grid Applications, National Institude of Standards and Technology Std., 2011.
[31] Y. Gobena et al., “Practical architecture considerations for smart grid WAN network,” in Proc. Power Systems Conference and Exposition (IEEE/PES), 2011, pp. 1–6.
[32] K. C. Budka, J. G. Deshpande, T. L. Doumi, M. Madden, and T. Mew, “Communication network architecture and design principles for smart grids,” Alcatel-Lucent, Tech. Rep., 2010.
[33] “Communications requirements of smart grid technologies,” US’s Department of Energy, Tech. Rep., Oct. 2010.
[34] J. G. Deshpande, E. Kim, , and M. Thottan, “Differentiated services QoS in smart grid communication networks,” Alcatel-Lucent, Tech. Rep., 2011.
[35] “RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks,”Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 6550, March 2012.
[36] “Overview of existing routing protocols for low power and lossy networks,” IETF ROLL, IETF draft, draft-ietf-rollprotocols-survey-07 (work in progress), Apr. 2009.
